<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mamma Kerr &#187; flexible working</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mammakerr.com/tag/flexible-working/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mammakerr.com</link>
	<description>Mummy-blogging Mum of Twins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Family Friendly Working Policies Cause Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.mammakerr.com/2009/12/family-friendly-working-policies-cause-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mammakerr.com/2009/12/family-friendly-working-policies-cause-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mamma Kerr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinionated Mamma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Mamma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carers leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family-friendly policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible working]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sick leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working mothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mammakerr.com/?p=1084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just read an article in todays Daily Mail, outlining plans by Womens Minister, Harriet Harman, to introduce paid carers leave. Here&#8217;s a little snippet from the article: &#8220;Workers will be entitled to claim paid leave to care for sick relatives under plans commissioned by Women&#8217;s Minister Harriet Harman. All employees would also win the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-1085" title="sickchild" src="http://www.mammakerr.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sickchild-150x150.jpg" alt="sickchild" width="150" height="150" />I&#8217;ve just read an article in todays Daily Mail, outlining plans by Womens Minister, Harriet Harman, to introduce paid carers leave.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a little snippet from the article:</p>
<p><span id="more-1084"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Workers will be entitled to claim paid leave to care for sick relatives under plans commissioned by Women&#8217;s Minister Harriet Harman.<br />
All employees would also win the right to request flexible working hours to look after children and the elderly.</p>
<p>The proposals are contained in a report demanded by Miss Harman into the needs of the so-called &#8216;sandwich generation&#8217; &#8211; working women who have to care for both young children and ageing relatives.</p>
<p>They are expected to be included in a green paper published by Miss Harman next year.</p>
<p>The proposals, revealed by Miss Harman at a think tank conference yesterday, are likely to prove popular with working women who Miss Harman has made it her special mission to woo.</p>
<p>But they will be dismissed by business leaders as likely to cost billions to firms who are struggling to stay afloat during the recession.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read more: <a title="Daily Mail article" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233945/Harriet-Harman-unveils-plan-allow-workers-claim-paid-leave-look-sick-relatives.html#ixzz0Z6IUYWU8" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233945/Harriet-Harman-unveils-plan-allow-workers-claim-paid-leave-look-sick-relatives.html#ixzz0Z6IUYWU8</a></p>
<p>As a working mum myself, I think these proposals are a good idea. I am fortunate enough to already have such leave arrangements available to me from my employer.</p>
<p>I appreciate we are in tough economic times, and that small businesses are struggling. However, I also know that many hard-working parents are struggling too! Family-friendly policies help to relieve stress for working parents.</p>
<p>I am astounded at the amount of inane drivel contained in the comments on the Daily Mail site, coming from grumpy old MEN!</p>
<p>Many comments bemoan maternity leave and flexible hours and potray female employees as &#8216;work-shy&#8217; and &#8216;wastes of space&#8217;!</p>
<p>Taking care of a sick child or elderly relative is not just WOMEN’s work! BOTH parents should take it in turns to take time off to care for a sick child. If a man (married or single) has a sick (or dying!) parent, then surely he would want time off to look after them (sharing the burden – &amp; time off – with any siblings). These proposals will be available to ALL employees, not just MOTHERS!</p>
<p>In my public sector job, I’m allowed 5 paid carers days per year to deal with family/dependant emergency obligations such as illness, injury, etc. I have used 2 such days in 5 years. I’m also entitled to Parental Leave, which is unpaid leave of up to a maximum of 13 weeks in respect of each child. These arrangements should be made available to all.</p>
<p>Who’ll nurse these grumpy old men, who’ve dismissed family-friendly policies, when they’re old &amp; infirm? I can’t imagine their family members would want to! They’ll probably just hire some paid help (as they no doubt did for any offspring!)</p>
<p>I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on the matter. Please leave a comment here and, while you&#8217;re at it, it would be great to see some more women&#8217;s comments on the Daily Mail website too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mammakerr.com/2009/12/family-friendly-working-policies-cause-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

